|
May
2, 2004 (Jimmie Johnson)
John 10:22-30
At
that time the festival of the Dedication took place in Jerusalem
. It was winter, and Jesus was walking in the temple, in the portico
of Solomon. So the Jews gathered around him and said to him, "How
long will you keep us in suspense? If you are the Messiah, tell
us plainly." Jesus answered, "I have told you, and you do not believe.
The works that I do in my Father's name testify to me; but you do
not believe, because you do not belong to my sheep. My sheep hear
my voice. I know them, and they follow me. I give them eternal life,
and they will never perish. No one will snatch them out of my hand.
What my Father has given me is greater than all else, and no one
can snatch it out of the Father's hand. The Father and I are one."
The
scripture quotations contained within are from the New Revised Standard
Version of the Bible, Copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian
Education of the National Council of Churches of Christ in the United
States of America, and are used by permission.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
What about those “other people”? By this I mean those
who are not in the Christian sheepfold, our neighbors who are adherents
of other religions or no religion? What about a text like this from
John where it sure sounds as if Jesus is stating that his sheep hear
his voice but the rest are likely to get sheared for eternity? At
least a surface reading would so indicate.
One afternoon I was having coffee with Rabbi Norman Klein, who at
the time was still here in Waco. I asked him what he thought was a
serious obstacle in Jewish-Christian relations. He said for him the
biggest was the anti-Semitism of the Christian scriptures where Jews
are referred to so negatively as if they were Christ killers and hell
bound and spiritually blind because of their unbelief in Jesus. The
gospel reading from John for this morning is such an example.
I asked the Rabbi what he wished we would do about these passages.
He responded quickly and clearly by saying, “Take them out.”
I said from my point of view it would be better for us Christians
to leave them in so that we are reminded how easily we can slip into
the religious sin of scapegoating, making ourselves look like true
believers by making others look like un-believers. By leaving them
in, Christian pastors and educators would then have to explain such
troublesome passages.
His response was that unfortunately the Jewish people can’t
rely on such sensitivity to be the norm among Christian leadership.
I think Rabbi Klein was right a few years ago, and his opinion is
still correct today. There is a huge un-Christian Christian attitude
toward non-Christians. Also there is a huge unwillingness to grant
some of our texts are less than Christ-like as well, strangely some
attributed to Christ.
So, what do we do with this text where the Jews are represented as
being so spiritually blind because of closed mindedness? And what
about those other people and their religions?
Well, let’s start with our Christian scripture and admit part
of our historical record, some of the texts of the New Testament,
do come across as sub-Christian to me. Then there are other troublesome
texts, such as Matthew 15:24 and Mark 7:26-27, where Jesus says he
was sent only for the Jews, the lost sheep of the House of Israel,
and not to the Gentiles or the “dogs” as he refers to
them. There are peculiar texts in the Bible, and there always have
been. Let’s acknowledge their existence and realize this doesn’t
diminish the Bible’s proper authority unless we have a fundamentalist
view of the Bible.
Biblical criticism is only a negative discipline if you worship the
Bible. Fortunately, at First Presbyterian and in most Reformed Tradition
churches, we don’t worship the Bible. We worship the Living
God. We don’t believe in the Bible. We believe only in the Living
God and in Jesus Christ, God’s Son, and in the Holy Spirit.
Actually, we don’t believe in any of our doctrine. We only believe
in the triune God. Our doctrines are systematic statements of our
beliefs, but they are not hitching posts. They are only sign posts.
Only the Living God is our hitching post, the end of our faith’s
journey.
Look, I have gotten a lot of response to the commentary I wrote for
the newspaper, particularly the part about God “not being a
Christian.” That’s not really as radical as it sounds.
It is centrist Christian theology. Centrist Christian thinking about
God has always declared it is the sin of idolatry to equate your religion
with God. Belief in God and belief in Christianity as a religion are
not equivalent. A belief system and the Living Mystery to which the
system can only point and never contain are not the same. Someone
said to me following up on the commentary, “Jimmie, you don’t
believe Jesus is God?” I said, “I do believe Jesus is
God, but I don’t believe all of God was in Jesus. So, no, I
don’t believe God is a Christian. I am a Trinitarian Christian
in my beliefs, but God is bigger than both my belief and my belief
system.” It is an act of sub-Christian thinking to equate your
religion with God.
Well, what about this kind of text? By the time John’s gospel
was written, the followers of Jesus who at first were all Jews had
become entangled in conflict with the Jews who were loyal to the synagogue
and who were uninterested in the Christian movement and who saw it
as a threat to their identity. For these Jews so invested in the Jewish
Temple and the institutions of their faith,
they could never say Jesus and God were one. The Temple and God, yes.
Jesus and God as one, no.
So this picture of “the Jews” in the text is one being
painted by Jewish Christians who were in conflict with their roots,
their families, their very fathers, mothers and siblings, in addition
to their neighbors. Christianity had not even been given its name,
yet. Christianity was in the beginning a Jewish sect which changed
dramatically when we gentiles, we barbarians, got in on the action
“a la” St. Paul. Therefore, such texts reflect this conflict
through the spin placed within the dialogue between Jesus and his
conversation partners.
When John’s gospel is talking about “the Jews,”
it is a symbol-system, meaning the “religious elite and their
leaders,” not the average Jew on the street or in the Temple
at prayer. An equivalent translation today would be Christian leaders
who preach love and practice a hate-filled and narrow-minded Christianity
to promote their little Bible colleges, television productions, and
congregations.
Although it is beneath us as believers, all religious people, if they
are not extremely sensitive, sin, this need to be right in religion.
We Christians even do this to one another. Until very recent times,
each of the Christian denominations tried to use the New Testament
to show the superiority of their view of baptism or church government,
why only believing adults should be baptized or why infants and adults
should both be baptized or why only by immersion or why by pouring
or sprinkling. Each denomination used to say only its form of church
government was biblical: the Episcopal form with bishops, or the Congregational
form as with Baptists or us Presbyterians with elders. Each denomination
tried to show the others were wrong while its was correct.
As time passed, scholarship has helped us see the truth that the early
church was very fluid and developmental with its understandings of
sacraments like baptism and forms of church government. In some places
there was immersion. In some places there was sprinkling. In some
places there was pouring. Sometimes only believers were baptized;
sometimes whole families including infants were baptized. In some
places there were elders. In some places there were deacons. In some
places there were bishops. Today none of the mainline denominations
take the approach that there is only one Christian view of the sacraments
or church government. Presbyterian ministers, for instance, can serve
in Lutheran or Episcopal congregations.
But what about this passage? This passage from John is helpful to
us because we Christians do believe Jesus is indeed the unique Shepherd
without being the exclusive Shepherd. No other Shepherd, no other
founder of a religion died as Jesus died nor had claims preached of
being brought back to life. Those who had such claims made about them
were discredited in time as fakes and charlatans, not so with Jesus.
His Easter has stood all historical investigation. The fakes have
all had failed Easters. They stay dead. But with Jesus, his resurrection
has never been proved nor disproved. It is why we call it “faith.”
For me, Jesus is the Messiah of God, the Son of God, the great Shepherd
of the sheep called Christian. To me, Jesus and the Father are one.
To me, he is the world’s Shepherd, too. I talk with non-Christians
not as if they are lost persons on their way to hell but as “loved
of God persons” who are children of God by God’s love
given through Christ to all sheep even if they don’t hear his
voice in Christian-sounding beliefs and practices.
When God looks at human beings, I believe God sees each one as Christ’s
lamb for whom Christ died as an innocent lamb. The love of God in
Christ is so secure that nothing in life or death can tear us human
beings loose from God’s providential and loving grasp unless,
I suppose, someone simply says, “No, I don’t want to be
held in your love.”
Friends, at First Pres, let’s be loving shepherds offering God’s
love and tender care to all God’s children whether they are
active in or members of this particular house or not. God is not a
Christian, but with all our hearts and minds let’s ask God’s
help to make us Christian in our thinking and in our believing and,
lest we forget, in our behaving as well. Let our church in the approaching
150th year of its life be known as a voice of love where all sheep
can detect the sound of God’s call. If we can get rid of our
arrogant haughtiness as Christian, then we can more effectively share
what we believe are truly unique dimensions of the Good Shepherd,
Jesus Christ.
To God alone be glory here at old First Pres! Let’s be a truly
big church, maybe not in numbers, but in heart and mind, which are
the only places that bigness really counts! |